This story was originally published at Conveners. Conveners builds powerful communities of practice for mission-driven leaders to connect, learn, and collaborate with each other. The industry resources we develop break down organizational silos and unlock the collective potential of the Impact Ecosystem.
We know that connecting with others has so many benefits, particularly in times of crisis and uncertainty, so we decided we could at least bring this diverse group of local grassroots leaders together virtually to generate and share learning as it emerged.
Yet as I was organizing online conversations for our partners, I was worried we’d leave people feeling like Zoom zombies after spending 90 minutes listening to others talk about such heavy stuff. I’m also a bit of a data geek, so while our Americas regional team brainstormed ways to make these large group video-calls more dynamic, I decided I wanted to test whether we were actually making people feel better or worse after participating. These video-calls were entirely voluntary, so people could just “vote with their feet” and not show up for the next one. So attendance was one potential metric, but I landed on a more direct but nuanced approach – ask participants how they felt.
We opened every video-call with some general words of welcome and a summary of what the session would look like, and then before going any further, we asked people a simple question: How are you feeling right now?
We’d share the results live, talk a bit about them, and move on to the activities and discussions we had planned. Some 80 minutes later, as we were wrapping up, we’d ask participants to answer the question again: How are you feeling right now?
We held three video-calls between April and May before taking a break (we started up again in late July). When we looked at the results of our polls, we learned four things.
Even after the first call, we could see that we were going in the right direction – at least people were not left feeling worse! Each of the subsequent calls showed the same positive move toward people feeling, on average, better.
By our third call, we’d been able to move from a 14% increase in happiness to a 22% increase in happiness. Though happiness wasn’t the primary goal for these conversation spaces, the old adage “you pay attention to what you measure” certainly held true. As we planned each call, we became more intentional about how people would feel and what would make the space interesting, engaging, and a bit of an escape from the chaos swirling outside.
If you want to end on the highest note possible, even if you can’t prove it, sacrifice measurement integrity for the sake of unbridled fun. We were not meticulous in making sure the first poll was taken before we said anything uplifting, nor did we make the end-line poll the very last thing we did at the end of each call. Data collection cannot get in the way of the goal you’re measuring. Electronic polls don’t make people happy; human connection and dancing do.
With each video-call we challenged ourselves to come up with new activities we could use and different features of the technology we could deploy. Here’s a short list of things we’ve tried over these three calls, often only once:
We’ll have to keep pushing ourselves to be creative as the novelty of these activities wears off and the outside world continues to make happiness a challenge, but we think it’s worth it. What creative ideas have you come up with to bring happiness into your online meetings?
Global Fund for Children (GFC) UK Trust, created in 2006, is a UK registered charity (UK charity number 1119544). We work to generate vital income, create new fundraising opportunities, and raise awareness of the invaluable work of GFC’s grassroots grantees. Our aim is to extend the reach of GFC in the United Kingdom, Europe, and beyond.
Work.Life, 4 Crown Place
London EC2A 4BT